Following another round of inverter issues, and generation meter misbehaviour I decided to actively investigate on–site battery storage.
Settling on a DC–coupled* Tesla Powerwall (their curvy first version) with a SolarEdge inverter.
(* Trying to reduce round–trip power losses due to rectification (AC—DC‡) and inversion (DC—AC). Powerwall 2 is AC–coupled for many reasons.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889e2/889e2c1218833e56127161536cf16b54f87770dd" alt="Sharp PV panels and SolarEdge optimisers"
These and an optimiser per PV (photovoltaic) panel† were fitted over two days around this time last year (October 2016).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bec8/4bec81a626bc861c69e3aadae0c38d6b68420bc9" alt="21 185W Sharp Photovoltaic panels"
(† There are 21 185W (Watt) Sharp panels, originally fitted August 2011. The original system is at least 80% paid off, not counting bill reduction(s).)
The result being: more use of electricity generated by photonic interactions with silicon wafers. (Some science.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3abc9/3abc988745869f8ab7e3881c9f0f6d06dd9c1a3c" alt="A year’s power generation, storage, and usage."
The upshot of this: many days’ nighttime usage covered by battery capacity (≤6.4kWh), negligible grid import, and bills where standing charge dwarfs unit expenditure.
e.g. “… for the period 29 June 2017 to 28 September 2017
- 12 units (1kWh kilowatt hour)
- 15.11p ex 5% VAT = 1.81 ex 5% VAT (value–added tax.)
- 92 days’ standing charge
- 30.87p ex 5% VAT = 28.40 ex 5% VAT
”
With the higher–level FIT (feed–in tariff), the 3.8+MWh generated over the year (translated to money in the bank) has been enough to pay those bills, and more…
[‡ no, not AC/DC.]